Yvonne Jones was off to a good start but let's just say she kind of fumbled the ball with her utterances in yesterday's
Telegram. In my previous post, I discussed why she might be tired of party politics but I have to disagree with doing away with the party system.
It seems more than passing strange that the leader of the Liberal Party would say there is very little difference between the parties and that we should consider getting rid of our current system of governance. If she wants to be the leader of her party she should show voters that there is a difference in approach, a difference in ideas between her party and the governing Progressive Conservatives. That is why she is paid a minister's salary, with a minister's staff. Liberals have to pay more attention to developing and discussing liberal policies. Politicians have no one to fault for this policy vacuum but themselves.
Yvonne's personal preferences become policy that is identified with the Liberal Party when she makes public utterances. Do Liberals wish to do away with the current democratic process in this province? Of course not!
The last time officials in this province called for the end of political parties was in 1933. William Warrender Mackenzie, Baron Amulree, Charles Alexander Magrath, and Sir William Ewen Stavert produced the Newfoundland Royal Commission Report.
Of course, Prime Minister Frederick Alderdice agreed with the recommendations and brought forth legislation requesting that our British masters suspend the constitution and implement the Royal Commission's recommendations.
Here are a few excerpts from that report: (They may sound a little familiar)
228. It should be appreciated, in the first place, that there is now no real distinction of principle between the political parties of Newfoundland. The names of Liberal, Conservative or Tory and Labour are in use but the division is rather one of persons. Secondly, the population of the Island is so small, and its financial resources are so restricted, that the choice of political candidates is severely limited.568. The influence of these considerations has been such that good work has been placed at a discount. Impartial administration is difficult; and even where men may have endeavoured to do their best for the country in spite of the obstacles confronting them, they have too often found their recommendations set aside or ignored on account of political or denominational considerations. Persistence in a course of action likely to arouse the opposition of those who have friends at court would at best be foolhardy and at worst suicidal.569. In the result, apart from very few individual exceptions, the Civil Servant is apt to be subservient to the politicians, is afraid of assuming responsibility for fear of offending them, has a tenure of office which is liable to be uncertain, and is generally lacking in efficiency.
And of course in the recommendation section:
3) It is essential, if this object is to be achieved, that the country should be given a rest from party politics for a period of years, and we have no hesitation in saying that, in the circumstances now prevailing in Newfoundland, the proposal that a system of "Commission by Government" should be established for a limited period affords the best means of enabling the Island to make a speedy and effective recovery from its present difficulties (paragraph 557).
P.S. We all have to find our legs, and a little stumble is going to happen from time to time.