Wednesday, May 16, 2018

IRRP PANEL - THE FIRST TRUDEAU MANDATE IN PERSPECTIVE AND ELECTION 2019

Canada's leading independent think tank has announced they will be hosting a panel of public policy and political experts to discuss the first 3/4 of the Federal Liberal Government and look at what to expect in Election 2019.

Jennifer Ditchburn will host the working lunch discussion for the Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRRP) on June 4th at the beautiful Suncor Energy Fluvairum.  The guest speakers are Memorials Alex Marland, Amanda Bittner and  President and CEO of the IRPP, Graham Fox.,

You can register for "the forum on-line.

Policy Options Magazine has been providing a diverse forum for decision makers and public policy for a generation. The magazine, articles and podcasts can be found on the Policy Options website.  As a student, journalist and later, political hack, it has always been my go to for articles and debates on public policy. 

Founded in 1972, the IRRP is an independent, national, nonprofit organization. Among other things they seek to improve public policy in Canada by generating research, providing insight and sparking debate that will contribute to the public policy decision-making process and strengthen the quality of the public policy decisions made by Canadian governments, citizens, institutions and organizations. IRPP's independence is assured by an endowment fund established in the early 1970s.

This promises to be an independent, well informed session. 

THE MINORITY GENDER AND MENTAL HEALTH

Canadian Mental Health Week 2018 has come and gone again.

 As the stigma of mental health challenges is addressed through education and some improvements in services,  there really is  hope for many who suffer needlessly. However, in my opinion there is still quite a lot of work to be done to address the needs of students and males. I was left wondering about the different approaches to mental health for genders and why men continue to be more likely than women to kill themselves?

As a school board trustee, school council member and former President of the Federation of School councils, I have long advocated for enhanced mental health services for a student population whose needs are growing in numbers and complexity. Existing resources are stretched to the point that caseloads prevent existing professionals from providing meaningful assistance. More resources are needed.

Currently, the formula provides for one counselor for every 500 students when organizations like the NLTA, NLFSC and the NLCPA have been calling for a ratio of 1:250 for some time now. We obviously need more school-based mental health professionals to ensure that needs are met in timely fashion. The result would be effective interventions.

The provincial governments blueprint Towards Recovery: The Mental Health and Addictions Action Plan for Newfoundland and Labrador is moving in the right direction but at a tortoise pace.

Newfoundland and Labrador is the first province in Canada to launch the MindWell-U 30 Day Mindfulness Challenge, an online e-health technology to support mental health. This is the latest e-health service added to the province’s suite of online mental health and addictions supports for people province-wide, which includes Strongest Families, Bridge the gApp, BreathingRoom™ and Therapy Assistance Online. The government also announced a mobile crisis intervention team will be launched province-wide and $230,000 to plan for enhanced child, youth and young adult services

One of the most significant gaps is the provision of specialized mental health care services is for treating  men. Women with depression are more likely to attempt suicide but men are more likely to die by suicide. Women are also more likely to see their GP and seek treatment. Men are simply not seeking treatment. It remains culturally hard in a society where suicide is considered by many to be  morally and mentally weak. Men are more likely to be arrested because they have behaved badly than go see a doctor and talk about the problems they face. In fact, men are often more intent on dying, they are more prone to "spur-of-the-moment" suicidal behavior and they use more effective means of killing themselves.

Juxtapose this against the fact that men have been culturally predisposed to be the "stronger gender" - we are not supposed to talk about issues the impact us emotionally or negatively. When is the last time you heard someone say "women up?" or to "grow a pair". Is it any surprise that male suicide rates are so high? Add to this that most men who kill themselves are not diagnosed with a condition.

It is obvious that there are still huge gaps in preventing male suicides. Despite acknowledging all of this we do not take a gendered approach which would greatly improve outcomes for young males and middle aged men. Why don't we have Men's Centers where men can go to talk about their challenges without feeling like less of a man for doing so? Why are these resources unavailable to men when they need them? Its time for a plan that talks about gender - and that minority composed of men.




Tuesday, May 15, 2018

TEARING DOWN THE BULLY PULPIT

Memorial University Political Science Profesor Amanda Bittner's issued a cutting criticism of Premier Dwight Ball in an opinion piece for CBC, this past weekend.  I expect that many of my readers have read and discussed this article.

There is a long tradition of abuse, intimidation and internal rivalries in party politics. Politics is often referred to as war by other means. dynamics of our zero-sum, to-the victors-goes-the-spoils and nepotistic party system. While party's speak of accountability, transparency, and democratic reform, there has been very little done to introduce democracy to the caucus system.  Government MHAs are expected to be seen  - not heard. Their votes pre-determined with very little input from a legislature that needs a broader committee system. Even speaking out in the privacy of caucus can be a ticket to a career in the backbenches.


While the gender issues have taken the spotlight, I think in the case of Dale Kirby, it would be fair to say he was an equal opportunity bully. While I have declined a number of interview requests because I did not wish to "pile-on" but after reading Professor Bittner's closing comments, I felt obligated to point out that there is a pattern of berating and intimidating individuals and organizations that disagreed with his position - or dared challenge him.

I was a little disillusioned with his transformation from an advocate for education issues to spouting the same lines as his Progressive Conservative predecessors.  The financial crisis left by the freewheeling big spending tories left the new administration very little room to navigate; a number of campaign promises were abandoned and a tax on literacy was introduced. My obligation to students, parents and school councils was to articulate their concerns. I take my integrity and commitment to organizations seriously.

On June 19th, 2016, the Newfoundland and Labrador Federation of School Councils met with Minister Kirby to discuss issues of concern in the wake of that year's budget.  The meeting took a bitter turn when Kirby called me out for comments I had made the previous day on VOCM Open Line related to the continued delays in construction of East Point Elementary. He took the opportunity to scold me and threaten to cut the funding of the provincial organization if I were to continue advocating publicly on the issue.  In the face of this indimidation of a volunteer organization, I walked out of the meeting and immediately called the Premier's office to discuss this incident of bullying and never received a return call.

Later in the Fall, after the same Minister publicly challenged the credibility of the NLTA President. The accusation was false. During a subsequent conversation with Pete Soucy on VOCM Backtalk, I called the Minister a bully which led to a strong-handed approach to have me removed as President. In the meantime, some disparaging rumors and a whisper campaign began that caused me a great deal of anxiety and concern about my professional reputation. I became the target of a scorched earth campaign.

Still related to education, the Minister wrote a blistering letter to the Newfoundland and Labrador English School District reminding trustees of their duty to keep our mouths shut and not to disagree with the provincial policy.  He was not impressed with Trustee Jennifer Aspell who had publicly expressed her concerns about problems and delays with the extension to the Mobile Central High School.  Keeping in mind the area had been approved for a new school but the decision was reversed in the 2016 budget. The governing board questioned the decision but government refused to bend. The board also requested an apology for Aspell but it never came.

There are many other examples of this particular MHA bullying individuals of differing genders, organizations and MHAs in an effort to stifle discussion and perceived dissent. Amongst them is his arrogant approach towards the members of the NDP Caucus in the House of Assembly where he regularly derided serious questions with insults and innuendo, lobbying fellow MHA's to not attend fundraisers for Government MHA's and of course the infamous e-mail seeking out the "leak"  following the oppositions revelations of harassment concerns in the Liberal Caucus.

To allow him back into the cabinet, or the caucus would only reinforce the idea that abusive politics is a permissible modus of operation in our democratic institutions.

I look forward to a comprehensive reform of the caucus system, the enhancement of individual MHA's independence, a clear harassment policy that allows the victim and the accused to find a fair, independent resolution that educates and changes unacceptable individual and group behaviors.  Premier Ball has an opportunity to transform democracy to make the House of Assembly a less intimidating environment for all individuals who prefer not to be treated like mushrooms.

Less anyone thinks that this behavior is limited to this Liberal Government.  Just recently, Federal Green Party Leader Elizebeth May was the focus of an independent review into claims of workplace bullying. Last week, The Green Party of Canada released a report that  found that the allegations of three former party employees "do not constitute workplace harassment."  She was accused of various forms of verbal and emotional abuse, including yelling at the staffers, putting them down in front of colleagues, and in one instance, slamming a door over an office paint job.  Disrespectful behavior for sure but it did not meet the legal standard of workplace harassment.

I wonder how Dr. Bittner feels about her colleague returning to teach at the university in light of his established pattern of intimidation, abuse and divisiveness?

LINK

Friday, May 11, 2018

THE EXECUTIONERS TURN AT THE GUILLOTINE

THE LINK to the National Post

THE LINK to National Post

BLATCHFORD: COUNTER POINT ON WORKPLACE HARRASSMENT




And here is the link to the article.

THE CONFIDENCE GAME



In June, Premier Ball will face a confidence vote at the Liberal Annual General Meeting. This leadership review, like the convention has been delayed.

I would be surprised if he failed to muster up the needed votes. His minions are keeping a careful eye on the process and the delegates, often stamping out the scent of desent. 

A question that has been rattling around in my nogen is what’s the magic percentage required for the premier to claim he has the confidence of the party not only continue leading but to be the standard bearer in next years provincial election? 

Personally, I would set the bar at 70%  - as a minimum. I suppose 65% might be marketable but would it  reflect real confidence.

It would be a dangerous move to replace the premier just a year and a bit before the election. Is there someone in the wings that can step-up and bring the party to re-election after this turbulent term? How would succession work under such circumstances? The future is murky. A public humiliation would serve no one, least of all the Liberal Party.

That said, I cant help but pause and reflect on the history of leadership reviews and the good and bad impacts they have had on parties and respectability

The first one that comes to my mind is Joe Clark. He failed to meet the 70% (66.9) bar and subsequently resigned only to seek the leadership again and lose to Brian Mulroney in 1983.

Parti Quebecois leader Bernard Landry quit after winning a 76-per-cent endorsement, which he deemed insufficient.

Former Alberta Premier Ralph Klein endorsed was endorsed by just 55 per cent of delegates at a review. He resigned a few months later.

In this province, Liberal Leader Leo Barry won a confidence vote but his caucus subsequently decided he had to go. Barry fought the caucus but bowed out in the leadership which crowned Clyde Wells.

The one recent example that I would be paying attention to occurred in Edmonton when just 48 per cent of delegates to the NDP’s convention showed confidence in keeping Mulcair as leader. after he led the party to a disappointing third-place finish in last fall’s election.

Very few people saw it coming but dissension is inherently destabilizing. The membership quietly handed Mulcair a public rebuke for losing the previous election. Suddenly he was a liability to 52% of his own party. It is hard to imagine a leader not having the political smarts to see the writing on the wall, to feel the political temperature and know the hearts and minds of your supporters.


I am fairly concerned that misplays have alienated or disappointing enough folks to create a quiet rebuke for Ball who has been up against it since his election. How large that rebuke is will tell the tale. I am counting on sober deliberation about switching pitchers so close to an election. The cost of leaderships in a pre-writ period, the loss of focus on governing while the wannabes look for support and putting it all back together when it is all over is all risky business. 

However, the Liberals have a few advantages. The other parties have selected their leaders for the next election.  

The question of what percentage is acceptable should be tackled in advance of the vote. This could be a few interesting weeks in Newfoundland politics